What refers to the process that allows subordinates to rate their supervisor's performance anonymously?

The process that allows subordinates to rate their supervisor's performance anonymously is known as upward feedback. This method is particularly valuable in organizational settings because it gives employees an opportunity to provide constructive criticism and insights about their supervisors' leadership and management styles. Upward feedback encourages a culture of open communication and can lead to improvements in managerial practices, fostering better relationships and enhancing team performance.

In upward feedback, employees are often more candid when providing evaluations since their responses remain confidential, which can promote honesty and transparency in the feedback process. This type of feedback is essential for development, allowing supervisors to gain perspectives that might not be visible to them from higher levels of management.

While peer review typically involves colleagues evaluating each other and self-assessment is where individuals evaluate their own performance, and downward feedback occurs when supervisors evaluate their subordinates, these processes do not serve the same purpose as upward feedback, which focuses specifically on the dynamics of subordinates evaluating their leaders.