What is Ingrid attempting to achieve by agreeing with the interviewer’s opinions?

Ingrid's agreement with the interviewer's opinions is a clear example of ingratiation. This is a social strategy where an individual seeks to gain favor or approval from others, often by aligning themselves with the viewpoints or preferences of those in positions of authority. In an interview context, agreeing with the interviewer can create a rapport, suggesting that Ingrid shares similar values or perspectives, which may improve her chances of making a positive impression.

Ingratiation is particularly effective in interviews as it helps develop a sense of connection, making it more likely for the interviewer to view the candidate as a good fit for the organization. While other strategies like persuasion, conformity, and flattery could also be part of interpersonal communication, they do not capture the essence of what Ingrid is doing by aligning herself with the interviewer's opinions. Persuasion involves convincing someone to adopt a different viewpoint, conformity implies changing one’s behaviors or beliefs to align with a group, and flattery is often more about complimenting someone rather than agreeing with their opinions. Thus, ingratiation is the most accurate representation of Ingrid's intent.